Skip to content

Citizen's guide to Three Sisters wildlife corridor

Over the next six months, Canmore Council will consider the Area Structure Plan (ASP) for the largest single development proposal this community has seen: all remaining Three Sisters Mountain Village (TSMV) development.

Over the next six months, Canmore

Council will consider the Area Structure

Plan (ASP) for the largest single development

proposal this community has seen:

all remaining Three Sisters Mountain Village

(TSMV) development.

At stake is whether, before development is

approved, the Province designates the remaining

Three Sisters wildlife corridors, including

the Stewart Creek section, in perpetuity as

required by the 1992 Decision of the Natural

Resources Conservation Board (NRCB), and

TSMV Site 9 is protected in perpetuity by a

conservation group.

Citizens can have input at two public hearings

(on the ASP and the Land Use Bylaw) and

three open houses (the Town’s Sustainability

Screening Report and two by the proponent).

Below is a guide to Canmore’s efforts to

ensure that these wildlife corridors are established

and protected in perpetuity – a 20-year

citizens’ campaign.

1990 Three Sisters Resorts (TSR) proposal for

the Stewart Creek Golf Course is approved,

where over 60 per cent of the land is wildlife

corridors.

1991 Proclamation of the NRCB.

1992 Following citizen concern at the NRCB

hearings, the board denies TSR’s proposal

to build in the Wind Valley and approves

it for Canmore’s Bow Valley, subject to 16

legally binding conditions and undertakings

including the provision of wildlife corridors

in “as undeveloped a state as possible” and

“consisting largely of trees, shrubs and shrub

meadow.”

NRCB gives Alberta Fish and Wildlife,

now Alberta Environment and Sustainable

Resource Development (AESRD), responsibility

to approve and designate wildlife corridors

on the TSR property.

1998 Citizens oppose the Three Sisters Master

Bylaw 1-98 that included all of the TSR property

in one bylaw. It is amended to bring each

new development to public hearings.

Citizens oppose Bylaw 2-98, which would

have zoned golf fairways and a driving range

in the wildlife corridors. It was not adopted.

The Province publishes the Bow Corridor

Ecosystem Advisory Group (BCEAG)

Guidelines for scientifically functional wildlife

corridors, where the minimum corridor width

is 450 metres below a slope of 25 degrees for a

one-kilometre corridor.

BCEAG guidelines adopted as policy in the

1998 Municipal Development Plan.

BCEAG standards win the Premier’s Award

of Excellence.

2000 Citizens oppose the Province’s draft

Conservation Easement Agreement to designate

wildlife corridors on Three Sisters land

because it would permit golf fairways, a golf

academy and a driving range in the corridors.

The citizen-funded Herrero Report applies

the 1998 BCEAG guidelines to the early

1990s Three Sisters wildlife corridors, and

finds them dysfunctional in width, slope and

hiding cover, where the earlier U.S. criteria

are inappropriate for Canmore’s mountain

terrain, winter conditions, multi-species, and

proximity to a populated area.

Conservationists petition the NRCB to

uphold its legal requirement that wildlife corridors

be provided “in as undeveloped a state

as possible.”

2001 Citizens criticize an inadequate revision

of the wildlife corridors proposed by TSMV

for Sites 1 and 3, leading to new Terms of

Reference for corridors in the Resort Area.

2002 Canmore council approves the subsequent

2002 Golder Report, including an

average “effective corridor width” of 635 m

(including a 35 m buffer) on the three km

corridor section in the TSMV Resort Area,

and sequencing building and human use as far

from the corridor as possible.

Three million dollar Federal G8

Environmental Legacy awarded to the 13 km

Three Sisters Along Valley Corridor, to build

two wildlife crossing structures.

Province’s Regional Wildlife Corridor Study:

Wind Valley/Dead Man’s Flats, based on two

years of scientific data validates the need for

a minimum corridor width of 450 m below a

slope of 25 degrees.

2003 Conservation Easement Agreement is

signed by the Province and TSMV protecting

600 m of the corridor in the Resort Area in

perpetuity, but not the 35 m buffer, which is

part of the corridor’s 635 m “effective width.”

In a letter to the Bow Corridor Organization

for Responsible Development (BowCORD)

and affiliated groups, the NRCB affirms it

“has a responsibility to see that the substantive

commitments, undertakings and conditions

with respect to wildlife corridors on the Three

Sisters property are met and this responsibility

will remain until the corridors are finally

designated for the entire property.”

2004 A letter to TSMV from the NRCB

affirms that “more recent scientific thought”

be used to designate the wildlife corridors

and that “final design (of the corridors) will

precede development plans for the (east) portion

of these corridor lands.”

Citizens call for the Golder 2002 land

use recommendations for effective corridor

width and sequenced land uses to be

applied to the TSMV Resort and Stewart

Creek areas.

Council approves the Area Structure Plans

for the Resort Area and Stewart Creek Golf

and Recreation Area, accepting “the Golder

2002 recommendations of the Golder Report

as a minimum.”

2005 TSMV and the Province negotiate a

2005 Provincial conservation easement on

95.9 hectares in the Stewart Creek Area,

including 63 h of the Stewart Creek Golf

Course and 32.9 h of Crown lease/public lands

– where over 60 per cent is wildlife corridors.

This agreement remains to be signed.

Citizens’ 20-year grass roots campaign supporting

the wildlife corridors is documented

by the Canadian Institute of Resources Law,

referencing “the ongoing public campaign…

co-ordinated since 2001 by Dr. Heather

MacFadyen, a Canmore resident.”

2006 Bylaw 36(Z)2004 zones the TSMV

Resort Area golf course, Golder’s second land

use, with a minimum building setback of 300

m “from any boundary of a designated wildlife

corridor” increasing “seasonal” functionality

of the 635 m corridor.

2007 TSMV and the Town sign a conservation

easement agreement on the 35 m along valley

corridor buffer in the resort area, completing

the corridor’s “effective width.”

2008 ASRD proposes completion of the

Three Sisters Wildlife Corridor on the basis

of Provincial scientific data since 2000, with

a minimum corridor width of 450 m below a

slope of 25 degrees.

2009 Town approves Terms of Reference for

the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)

and Area Structure Plan (ASP) on all of the

remaining undeveloped TSMV property.

TSMV offers 400 acres of “Legacy Lands” in

Site 9 for protection in perpetuity.

TSMV goes into receivership, except for

the Stewart Creek Golf Course, which is now

under separate ownership.

2012 On Nov. 20, the Town approves the

Terms of Reference for the EIS and the

“Framework Agreement” where the receiver

(PricewaterhouseCoopers) proposes terms for

a new ASP for the remainder of the TSMV

property, including conservation of Site 9,

where the unprotected Wind Valley section of

the Along Valley Wildlife Corridor is located.

On Dec. 18, council approves the Terms

of Reference for the ASP, where “there is no

development... until Site 9 is transferred to a

conservation group agreeable to the Province

of Alberta, the Town and PwC for conservation

purposes in perpetuity.”

Heather MacFadyen, PhD, has served

on Canmore’s Environmental Advisory

Review Committee, the Board of Directors

of CPAWS (Calgary-Banff) and the Bow

Riverkeeper, and is Chair of BowCORD,

an intervener in the 1992 NRCB Hearings

on Three Sisters Golf Resorts Inc. In 2010,

MacFadyen received a national award from

Earth Day Canada for her conservation work

in the Bow Valley.


Rocky Mountain Outlook

About the Author: Rocky Mountain Outlook

The Rocky Mountain Outlook is Bow Valley's No. 1 source for local news and events.
Read more



Comments

push icon
Be the first to read breaking stories. Enable push notifications on your device. Disable anytime.
No thanks